Generational bans on local sales in the United States that could expand

An article in the investigative journal The Examination noted that Massachusetts has become one of the few territories in the world to have implemented generational ban legislation prohibiting the sale of tobacco products and sometimes nicotine to anyone born after a certain date.[1]. The goal is to prevent successive generations from taking up smoking and, ultimately, to eliminate tobacco and nicotine from everyday life.

An anti-smoking measure in Massachusetts implemented through the local initiative mechanism

Massachusetts' experience is part of a longer history of anti-smoking regulation: Brookline was one of the first US territories to ban smoking in most indoor public places in 1994. The city of Needham was then the first to raise the legal selling age to 21, well before this rule became federal in 2019.

The generational ban adopted in Brookline in 2020 concerns the sale of all tobacco and nicotine products – including e-cigarettes and nicotine pouches – to people born on or after January 1st.^er January 2000. Merchants challenged the measure in court, arguing that it conflicted with the law setting the minimum selling age at 21 and that it created discrimination based on date of birth. But the state's highest court ruled in favor of Brookline in 2024, paving the way for the rapid spread of the model. In the months and years that followed, 21 other cities and towns adopted similar laws. As a result, more than 600,000 Massachusetts residents now live in areas where the sale of tobacco and other nicotine products is prohibited to all generations.

The success of this movement owes much to the leeway elected officials have in public health matters in Massachusetts. This allows local health boards to adopt such protective measures without waiting for state or federal reform.

Health councils, often composed of elected officials or volunteers, are small structures, less exposed to industry lobbying than larger assemblies. This reality of local power in health matters has allowed committed individuals like Maureen Buzby to pass increasingly ambitious bans, city after city. Maureen Buzby is presented as the main organizer of this campaign to develop a generational ban. A former finance executive, she became involved in addiction prevention after her retirement, before working as a local tobacco prevention officer in the suburbs of Boston. Her commitment was built on firsthand experience: monitoring illegal sales to minors, observing new nicotine products, and engaging with local health authorities. She says she has seen the arrival, over the years, of flavored cigarillos, novelty e-cigarettes, and discreet, inexpensive nicotine pouches, which she considers products designed to attract new customers, especially younger ones. According to her, the industry constantly needs to renew its customer base, and teenagers are the prime target. This observation fuels her determination to ban all future sales of these products to current and future generations.

To date, 22 cities in Massachusetts have implemented this generational sales ban. Indiana and Hawaii have attempted to do the same, without success so far. California, Minnesota, and New York, while not committing to this generational ban, have implemented bans on all nicotine products or sales licenses to achieve similar results.

A measure that tends to expand beyond the local level

These initially local measures inevitably influence public policy at a national level. Currently, a proposed generational ban is being considered at the state level in Massachusetts as a whole. Its adoption could take time. Therefore, for Maureen Buzby, the strategy of pursuing and expanding local victories to create political leverage must be continued, even though it also presents challenges. A dozen states, such as Washington and New Hampshire, have, for example, prohibited local governments from adopting certain anti-smoking measures.

Furthermore, opposition has been mounted to counter this measure. Groups close to retailers and the tobacco industry, such as the New England Convenience Store and Energy Marketers Association (sponsored by tobacco companies Altria, Reynolds American, and ITG Brands), are challenging these laws in the name of individual liberties and the democratic process. Their argument is that nicotine products remain legal for adults and should therefore be sold in regulated stores. This group has helped to defeat intergenerational bans in several Massachusetts cities. The level of opposition reflects the high stakes for manufacturers, with the risk of them withdrawing from tobacco and their other nicotine products in the more or less long term.

The investigation conducted by The Examination highlights that these initiatives are significantly contributing to changing societal norms. The idea is gradually gaining ground that it is no longer acceptable to sell tobacco and nicotine to entire generations born after a certain date.

Elsewhere in the world, New Zealand was a pioneer in this area, but the measure was abolished following a change of government, which became close to tobacco manufacturers. The Maldives were the first country to implement the ban for anyone born after 2007.. In the United Kingdom, where the measure is being discussed as part of the Tobacco and Vapes Bill, The nation of Wales has already separately adopted this measure for anyone born after 2009.

In France, the Green Party MP Nicolas Thierry presented a cross-party bill aimed at banning the sale of tobacco to people born on or after January 1st^er January 2014, with the support of anti-smoking NGOs united within the Contre-Feu alliance.

Other countries like Malaysia would like to implement such a measure but face strong opposition from the industry which interferes to block such a provision.

©Generation Without Tobacco

AD

[1]Jason McLure, The Massachusetts activist fighting to ban nicotine for generations to come, The Examination, published April 16, 2026, accessed April 17, 2026

National Committee Against Smoking |